I want to offer some context on this essay, as it has prompted considerable discussion, some of it cynical, some of it sincere. That alone is useful. We are entering an age in which clarity, not consensus, divides the serious from the sentimental.
First, a point of origin. This essay’s structure and original conception date back to the year 2000. While several policy specifics, such as denaturalization procedures and legal reforms, have been sharpened over time, the vision remains unchanged. It was first drafted during a period when open racial advocacy was even more isolated than it is today, yet the trajectory it predicted has only accelerated. That its contents remain relevant a quarter-century later is not a mark of utopianism, but proof that the crisis is structural, racial, and unresolved.
Some may be surprised to learn that it was Dr. William Luther Pierce who personally encouraged me to write this. More than that, he encouraged me to begin writing in general, many years ago. I do not invoke his name lightly. He remains one of the clearest and most uncompromising voices our people have produced in the last century. Like myself, he believed in a multi-front approach to survival and renewal: not merely cultural critique, not merely political agitation, but a comprehensive, long-term strategy rooted in propaganda, preparation, and principled racial commitment. I continue to honor that orientation.
This text, therefore, should not be mistaken for a policy wishlist written in hope that our enemies might one day see reason. It is a weapon in a broader strategy of recovery and revolt. I write for those who understand that White survival is not compatible with the current system. I write for those who grasp that America was founded as a racial nation, a nation for and by Whites, and that it is now in the final stages of transformation into something alien and unrecognizable. And I write for those who understand that while this process cannot be reversed through conventional politics alone, exoteric action must still be pursued as part of a broader, multipronged strategy.
That strategy is as follows: we must combine public policy advocacy, legal agitation, metapolitical influence, and long-term preparation. The exoteric must work in tandem with the esoteric. We must advocate explicitly White interests in the open, not because we expect the system to comply, but because we must assert the moral and civilizational legitimacy of our position. The regime must be confronted directly on the grounds of justice, sovereignty, and continuity, even if it does not relent, and precisely because it will not. Such advocacy slows the machinery of replacement, provides necessary reprieve, even if temporary, and most importantly, recruits. It brings the passive White into consciousness. It exposes the anti-White animus embedded in every level of American policy, education, and culture. It moves the dialectic forward.
The metapolitical dimension, the war of ideas, symbols, and cultural assumptions, must not be neglected. The system governs not only through force but through its control of moral perception. It tells Whites they have no right to exist as a people. That their inheritance is a crime. That their future must be erased to redeem the past. These lies must be named, mocked, burned, and replaced. If we do not reclaim the moral language, we will never regain institutional power, even temporarily, nor delay the collapse long enough for others to reach our position. Every serious movement begins in moral clarity, not in political compromise.
But I would go further. What we are facing is not merely decline, but collapse. The United States is no longer a stable entity in need of reform. It is a decaying mass held together by bureaucracy, coercion, and inertia. The future is not federal, it is post-American. What awaits us is not national renewal from above, but rupture from within. The borders will remain, the flag will fly, but the nation will be gone.
And when that happens, the only people who will endure are those who prepared for its dissolution: racially conscious Whites, bound by loyalty, memory, and blood. I do not believe in vague talk of parallel societies or ethnocultural alternatives. I believe in small, sovereign White enclaves, ethnostates in embryo, founded by men who understand that we are not here to preserve our own comfort, or to prolong our small and insignificant lives, but to keep the flame lit for the future of our race.
Those who have served in the military, or traveled extensively through the non-Western world, already know what such a future will resemble. The Third World, and any world in perpetual collapse, is Hobbesian in the fullest sense: tribal, chaotic, and ruled by force. It is not a hypothetical nightmare. It is the norm across vast stretches of the globe. And it is a glimpse of what awaits us should we fail to prepare. It will not be kind to the unready.
These enclaves will not arise spontaneously. They must be envisioned, organized, and defended. That is why I write.
Will any of the policies laid out in this essay be adopted by the current regime? No. They are not meant to be. They are a vision of what a real White nation would enact if it valued its continuity. They serve to orient, to instruct, and to provoke. They offer a litmus test for seriousness. If someone opposes them, he is either unserious or on the other side.
This is not politics as persuasion. It is politics as declaration. It is the moral reassertion of a people who refuse extinction. A politics for Whites, by Whites, in the interest of a future where our children are not minorities, our culture is not criminalized, and our civilization is not a footnote in someone else’s narrative.
We do not write these things in hope that the system will listen. We write them to remind our own that they are not alone. That the time is short. And that what cannot be reformed must be replaced.
I agree with much of this. But I think that trying to save 'America' is a mistake. The assumption is that Whites can take back control of the means of decision-making and bend the institutions back to some kind of 'neutral' position on race. Not only is that not possible, but it's also never going to happen.
White American trying to 'save America' is the sunk cost fallacy expressed on a grand scale. The investment of White Americans in 'America' has soured. White Americans need to cut their losses, not continue to invest in a losing stock.
The weak link in the American system was the attempt to create a deracinated 'universal human' called 'American' *who was nonetheless almost universally White*. The result was a complete exploitation of 'high trust' White people's tendency to 'think globally' to completely dissolve all White racial solidiarity. The result was a White people who did not know or care if they were White *and a national system that didn't care, either*.
However, other races in 'America' did not play this game. Jews and Negros both focused on their racial interests ultimately achieving the anti-White system that dominates the 'national character'.
The only way for White Americans to achieve any kind of leverage in this situation is to accept that White Racial Solidarity is more important than *anything*. More important than 'family' or 'nation' or 'borders'. Anything.
It wasn't the attack on the family that destroyed White American family-formation.
It was the attack on Whiteness that destroyed White American family-formation.
The White race must come first in all things *for Whites*.
Once pro-White racial consciousness-raising starts to take hold among Whites, the pillars of anti-Whiteness will start to wobble.
But 'America' will be no more. There will only be White America and *those other people* living in North America.
If White Americans persist in thinking that other races will love them for keeping 'America' functioning, they're going to be destroyed by the reality of racial antagonism.
If you want to be loved, buy a puppy.
If you want a racial reckoning that is favorable to Whites, evolving towards a relentless White racial solidarity is the only possible path that will deliver durable success.
Completely correct. The main cause of the destruction of White America has been television, the greatest propaganda tool ever conceived. South Africa didn't have television until around 1990. and once they permitted it, look what happened. And no, voting, or trying to take over various 'institutions' isn't going to work, we don't have time.
I must respectfully disagree. The main cause of the destruction of White America is the deracinated concept of 'America' itself to which Whites bought in but all other races did not (and do not). Non-Whites will support 'America' only to the extent that it advances their racial interests. Whites, on the other hand, think that 'sacrificing' for 'America' is the way to 'teach' non-Whites how to be 'American'.
A lesson that 90% do not learn and many absolutely refuse to learn.
Until Whites come to all problems with a pro-White mind-set - until we consistently and relentlessly act on an *ethos* of 'Whites caring about Whites because they are White' - it doesn't matter how much power we have, we'll be 'thinking globally' which means - at least part of the time - we'll be working for non-Whites. Who don't care about us and never well.
Sure, I don't disagree with your view, but you have to remember that the media has been controlled by the jews for over a century. Americans weren't always so flabby, it's been a constant campaign to demasculinize society, whether it's television, schools, newspapers, books, whatever, it's been an unrelenting torrent of anti-White propaganda. My husband was remarking that even back in the 1950s with sitcoms, dad was often 'in the doghouse' for some slight or mistake. I'll give these worms credit, they are subtle. Consider movies: years of movies showing the mean White man attacking the noble and innocent Indians. This softened Whites up for pity and guilt over blacks. They knew if they pushed blacks too early, it wouldn't work, so they used Indians to start because they aren't as alien. They are clever, like rats.
Most 'anti-White propaganda' appeals to 'Christian virtues' like 'love your neighbor' and 'turn the other cheek' and 'suffering is good for the soul' all forms of martyrdom. The jews were careful to always build their poison on the existing infirmity that 'christianity' created.
This struggle against White self-immolation has been going on for more than a millennia. Many (many) Whites are disposed to self-immolation as 'heroic' because of the christianization of White cultures.
Somehow Whites have to learn that 'being noble' to the advantage of other races is immoral.
Well, Christians have been played for a long time by the jews. I always remember that St. Paul was really Saul who was an active Christian killer. He allegedly had some kind of revelation, but my take on it is that he realized he couldn't exterminate all of them, he would corrupt Christianity.
This is one of the clearest and most comprehensive statements of what should be done that I’ve seen in years. Every point is sound. The diagnosis is accurate. The prescriptions are rational and necessary.
But we must be honest. None of this is going to happen under the current regime.
Not one of these policies will be enacted by a system whose very purpose is to prevent them. The political, legal, and economic order in place today does not suffer from a lack of vision. It suffers from deliberate sabotage. It exists to manage decline, not to reverse it.
Which means we face a brutal but liberating conclusion: the system will not be reformed. It will not save us. It will not return to reason. What you have outlined is not a political program for the next election cycle. It is a standard—a vision of what a healthy nation would look like, and therefore a measuring stick for what we must build outside the official frame.
Yes, we must halt demographic collapse. Yes, we must restore moral order, sovereignty, and cultural continuity. But the path there will not run through ballots or policy papers. It will run through parallel structures, rooted in land, blood, and loyalty. Quiet, local, durable.
This text should be read not as a campaign platform but as a call to prepare—so that when the collapse becomes undeniable, something better is already growing beneath the ruins.
I agree. The system needs to crumble and change. Or balkanization of some sort. This program could have overwhelming support and it still wouldn’t happen. Hell, massive change to immigration policy already has overwhelming support in many western countries, and it still isn’t enacted.
All of the people who have the power to implement what you want, are against what you want. This isn't going to change within the current system. Too many people engage in such wishful thinking, we need to start at step 1: how do Whites get back to the point where we have the power to choose how we live? Voting in our current system is not the answer.
"A serious program of demographic recovery must follow. This begins with the immediate deportation of illegal aliens."
0 immigration and 100% enforcement changes the date Whites become a minority by a year or 2. Mass deportation due solely to ethnicity without regard for citizenship status is the only way Whites maintain a nation that Whites would want to live in. That isn't going to happen with the current system.
You're absolutely right. We need to stop pretending that moral clarity or sound policy will change anything. The people in charge aren't confused or waiting for better ideas. They're hostile to our existence, and they plan to stay that way.
The policies in “A Program for White Survival and American Renewal” are sensible, necessary, and grounded in reality. But believing they can be enacted through the current system is wishful thinking. That system exists to stop precisely this kind of renewal. It punishes defiance, rewards submission, and ensures that nothing essential is ever allowed to change.
So yes, the real first step is reclaiming the power to choose how we live. That power won't come through voting. It begins in the physical world. Families. Land. Skills. Culture. Bonds of trust that exist outside of state control.
This doesn't mean we give up. It means we stop waiting. We build where we are, with what we have, among those who still remember what a future worth living looks like.
The system will not save us. That truth should not lead to despair. It should lead to action
I'm sick of this shit. I agree with all the points, but I will never concede that it's impossible for White men to regain control of Shitshow America until fighting White men by the thousands attempt to run for political office all around the country on an explicitly pro-White, anti-jewish platform over and over and over again until exhaustion. White people need to see White people trying really hard and either failing or succeeding. Whatever the outcome, the metaphorical table will then be set for whatever comes next. There will be no more mealy-mouthed bullshit or political tricks attempting to put a veneer of civility on what is an outright war against our nation and race. Until I see that happen and fail, I will not concede this point. I don't even think we're lacking in numbers, I think we're lacking in vision and clarity, and maybe sufficient levels of piss and vinegar. There are at least 50 million adult White men in the good old USA. We have the numbers. If we bless our country ourselves, and then we'll suddenly find that "god" blessed the USA.
This is an excellent manifesto and your pinned comment and how you see the future unfolding makes complete sense.
For me, I feel a deep intellectual and spiritual kinship with White Americans, and indeed physical kinship as my family has been in this country since the 17th century in Virginia, and I have several White ancestors in my lineage.
Not that you need my solidarity to save your race and preserve the unique American identity, but you have it from me.
From a young age, I’ve never resonated with my Black brethren as much as I have with my White friends and family members, and I look in abject horror at the mentality and behavior of many of them.
You are the architects of this country's success and what makes it great. I wish you nothing but the best in your fight for the future of your people.
I suspect the future holds enclaves carved from the original nation, and I'm actually optimistic in that regard. As for the United States as a polity, and I would not be surprised if this was the purpose all along of mass migration and the other social ills inflicted upon us, it cannot be salvaged in its current form. We need to think in terms of what follows. I very much appreciate your continued mention of conservation and environmentalism, which are almost exclusively white things. Blood and soil nationalism, the only type that works and that should be encouraged, requires land as its very name implies. Quite recent and past attempts to sever our people from the soil indicate our enemies also realize this. Again, we need to realize the actual intent of the destroyers likely was based on malice rather than foolishness.
Although I disagree with an endpoint of preservation of a failed state, which the United States certainly is despite its wealth, the goals and means you set forth are spot on. We will need to acknowledge what failed within the past state and work to avoid those pitfalls to create a more and actual perfect union.
Who Chad? Time to start naming their names! Who are these people who despise us so? What companies employ them? Who funds their operations? Where are their offices? Where did they learn these terrible things? Who writes their copy? What clubs have they joined? Who puts on their concerts? Who promotes their horrible music? Who designs their images? ? Delenda est!
You can start with Trump, the blowhard, who wants another half million chinese students in America. And as for his deporting the invaders, it's a pathetic effort, he would need to deport almost 13,000 a day to have any significant effect, the piddly 666, of all things, that he's doing isn't going to make a dent; 240,000 a year out of probably 30 million? Come on.
Why does this matter? How does 'naming names' accomplish anything? Do you think our enemies fear retribution? They do not. They know that Whites are suckers for 'racial reconciliation'. We have no power over our enemies because we have no direction amongst ourselves. For Whites, there can be only one path to durable success: Whites caring about Whites because they are White. Instead of worrying about 'Who?', tend to the Whites around you. Show them you care. Stop worrying about what the other guy is doing and look to your own efforts. There's always plenty to do.
He is being sarcastic, but seriously Hamburger Man. No troll, I chatted with a lot of National Socialist people. You have the most realistic and sustainable path to your ideals. Kudos, seriously not trolling.
Got the pdf and read the preface! Shit! I’ve never had it so compellingly compiled! Sorrow, I feel great sorrow! So many dead! I am at a loss, Chad! My heart sinks! So much blood and death! For who?? I spent three years in the infantry, for who? I am almost afraid to read the book! Thank you, Sir!
I want to offer some context on this essay, as it has prompted considerable discussion, some of it cynical, some of it sincere. That alone is useful. We are entering an age in which clarity, not consensus, divides the serious from the sentimental.
First, a point of origin. This essay’s structure and original conception date back to the year 2000. While several policy specifics, such as denaturalization procedures and legal reforms, have been sharpened over time, the vision remains unchanged. It was first drafted during a period when open racial advocacy was even more isolated than it is today, yet the trajectory it predicted has only accelerated. That its contents remain relevant a quarter-century later is not a mark of utopianism, but proof that the crisis is structural, racial, and unresolved.
Some may be surprised to learn that it was Dr. William Luther Pierce who personally encouraged me to write this. More than that, he encouraged me to begin writing in general, many years ago. I do not invoke his name lightly. He remains one of the clearest and most uncompromising voices our people have produced in the last century. Like myself, he believed in a multi-front approach to survival and renewal: not merely cultural critique, not merely political agitation, but a comprehensive, long-term strategy rooted in propaganda, preparation, and principled racial commitment. I continue to honor that orientation.
This text, therefore, should not be mistaken for a policy wishlist written in hope that our enemies might one day see reason. It is a weapon in a broader strategy of recovery and revolt. I write for those who understand that White survival is not compatible with the current system. I write for those who grasp that America was founded as a racial nation, a nation for and by Whites, and that it is now in the final stages of transformation into something alien and unrecognizable. And I write for those who understand that while this process cannot be reversed through conventional politics alone, exoteric action must still be pursued as part of a broader, multipronged strategy.
That strategy is as follows: we must combine public policy advocacy, legal agitation, metapolitical influence, and long-term preparation. The exoteric must work in tandem with the esoteric. We must advocate explicitly White interests in the open, not because we expect the system to comply, but because we must assert the moral and civilizational legitimacy of our position. The regime must be confronted directly on the grounds of justice, sovereignty, and continuity, even if it does not relent, and precisely because it will not. Such advocacy slows the machinery of replacement, provides necessary reprieve, even if temporary, and most importantly, recruits. It brings the passive White into consciousness. It exposes the anti-White animus embedded in every level of American policy, education, and culture. It moves the dialectic forward.
The metapolitical dimension, the war of ideas, symbols, and cultural assumptions, must not be neglected. The system governs not only through force but through its control of moral perception. It tells Whites they have no right to exist as a people. That their inheritance is a crime. That their future must be erased to redeem the past. These lies must be named, mocked, burned, and replaced. If we do not reclaim the moral language, we will never regain institutional power, even temporarily, nor delay the collapse long enough for others to reach our position. Every serious movement begins in moral clarity, not in political compromise.
But I would go further. What we are facing is not merely decline, but collapse. The United States is no longer a stable entity in need of reform. It is a decaying mass held together by bureaucracy, coercion, and inertia. The future is not federal, it is post-American. What awaits us is not national renewal from above, but rupture from within. The borders will remain, the flag will fly, but the nation will be gone.
And when that happens, the only people who will endure are those who prepared for its dissolution: racially conscious Whites, bound by loyalty, memory, and blood. I do not believe in vague talk of parallel societies or ethnocultural alternatives. I believe in small, sovereign White enclaves, ethnostates in embryo, founded by men who understand that we are not here to preserve our own comfort, or to prolong our small and insignificant lives, but to keep the flame lit for the future of our race.
Those who have served in the military, or traveled extensively through the non-Western world, already know what such a future will resemble. The Third World, and any world in perpetual collapse, is Hobbesian in the fullest sense: tribal, chaotic, and ruled by force. It is not a hypothetical nightmare. It is the norm across vast stretches of the globe. And it is a glimpse of what awaits us should we fail to prepare. It will not be kind to the unready.
These enclaves will not arise spontaneously. They must be envisioned, organized, and defended. That is why I write.
Will any of the policies laid out in this essay be adopted by the current regime? No. They are not meant to be. They are a vision of what a real White nation would enact if it valued its continuity. They serve to orient, to instruct, and to provoke. They offer a litmus test for seriousness. If someone opposes them, he is either unserious or on the other side.
This is not politics as persuasion. It is politics as declaration. It is the moral reassertion of a people who refuse extinction. A politics for Whites, by Whites, in the interest of a future where our children are not minorities, our culture is not criminalized, and our civilization is not a footnote in someone else’s narrative.
We do not write these things in hope that the system will listen. We write them to remind our own that they are not alone. That the time is short. And that what cannot be reformed must be replaced.
Prepare accordingly.
I agree with much of this. But I think that trying to save 'America' is a mistake. The assumption is that Whites can take back control of the means of decision-making and bend the institutions back to some kind of 'neutral' position on race. Not only is that not possible, but it's also never going to happen.
White American trying to 'save America' is the sunk cost fallacy expressed on a grand scale. The investment of White Americans in 'America' has soured. White Americans need to cut their losses, not continue to invest in a losing stock.
The weak link in the American system was the attempt to create a deracinated 'universal human' called 'American' *who was nonetheless almost universally White*. The result was a complete exploitation of 'high trust' White people's tendency to 'think globally' to completely dissolve all White racial solidiarity. The result was a White people who did not know or care if they were White *and a national system that didn't care, either*.
However, other races in 'America' did not play this game. Jews and Negros both focused on their racial interests ultimately achieving the anti-White system that dominates the 'national character'.
The only way for White Americans to achieve any kind of leverage in this situation is to accept that White Racial Solidarity is more important than *anything*. More important than 'family' or 'nation' or 'borders'. Anything.
It wasn't the attack on the family that destroyed White American family-formation.
It was the attack on Whiteness that destroyed White American family-formation.
The White race must come first in all things *for Whites*.
Once pro-White racial consciousness-raising starts to take hold among Whites, the pillars of anti-Whiteness will start to wobble.
But 'America' will be no more. There will only be White America and *those other people* living in North America.
If White Americans persist in thinking that other races will love them for keeping 'America' functioning, they're going to be destroyed by the reality of racial antagonism.
If you want to be loved, buy a puppy.
If you want a racial reckoning that is favorable to Whites, evolving towards a relentless White racial solidarity is the only possible path that will deliver durable success.
Unironically the best play I have read so far. Just focus on whiteness and keep it localized. Anything more ambitious will be crushed.
Focusing on 'Whites caring about Whites because they are White' *is* ambitious.
This. We have to acknowledge the malice to deal with it appropriately.
Completely correct. The main cause of the destruction of White America has been television, the greatest propaganda tool ever conceived. South Africa didn't have television until around 1990. and once they permitted it, look what happened. And no, voting, or trying to take over various 'institutions' isn't going to work, we don't have time.
I must respectfully disagree. The main cause of the destruction of White America is the deracinated concept of 'America' itself to which Whites bought in but all other races did not (and do not). Non-Whites will support 'America' only to the extent that it advances their racial interests. Whites, on the other hand, think that 'sacrificing' for 'America' is the way to 'teach' non-Whites how to be 'American'.
A lesson that 90% do not learn and many absolutely refuse to learn.
Until Whites come to all problems with a pro-White mind-set - until we consistently and relentlessly act on an *ethos* of 'Whites caring about Whites because they are White' - it doesn't matter how much power we have, we'll be 'thinking globally' which means - at least part of the time - we'll be working for non-Whites. Who don't care about us and never well.
Sure, I don't disagree with your view, but you have to remember that the media has been controlled by the jews for over a century. Americans weren't always so flabby, it's been a constant campaign to demasculinize society, whether it's television, schools, newspapers, books, whatever, it's been an unrelenting torrent of anti-White propaganda. My husband was remarking that even back in the 1950s with sitcoms, dad was often 'in the doghouse' for some slight or mistake. I'll give these worms credit, they are subtle. Consider movies: years of movies showing the mean White man attacking the noble and innocent Indians. This softened Whites up for pity and guilt over blacks. They knew if they pushed blacks too early, it wouldn't work, so they used Indians to start because they aren't as alien. They are clever, like rats.
Most 'anti-White propaganda' appeals to 'Christian virtues' like 'love your neighbor' and 'turn the other cheek' and 'suffering is good for the soul' all forms of martyrdom. The jews were careful to always build their poison on the existing infirmity that 'christianity' created.
This struggle against White self-immolation has been going on for more than a millennia. Many (many) Whites are disposed to self-immolation as 'heroic' because of the christianization of White cultures.
Somehow Whites have to learn that 'being noble' to the advantage of other races is immoral.
Well, Christians have been played for a long time by the jews. I always remember that St. Paul was really Saul who was an active Christian killer. He allegedly had some kind of revelation, but my take on it is that he realized he couldn't exterminate all of them, he would corrupt Christianity.
This is one of the clearest and most comprehensive statements of what should be done that I’ve seen in years. Every point is sound. The diagnosis is accurate. The prescriptions are rational and necessary.
But we must be honest. None of this is going to happen under the current regime.
Not one of these policies will be enacted by a system whose very purpose is to prevent them. The political, legal, and economic order in place today does not suffer from a lack of vision. It suffers from deliberate sabotage. It exists to manage decline, not to reverse it.
Which means we face a brutal but liberating conclusion: the system will not be reformed. It will not save us. It will not return to reason. What you have outlined is not a political program for the next election cycle. It is a standard—a vision of what a healthy nation would look like, and therefore a measuring stick for what we must build outside the official frame.
Yes, we must halt demographic collapse. Yes, we must restore moral order, sovereignty, and cultural continuity. But the path there will not run through ballots or policy papers. It will run through parallel structures, rooted in land, blood, and loyalty. Quiet, local, durable.
This text should be read not as a campaign platform but as a call to prepare—so that when the collapse becomes undeniable, something better is already growing beneath the ruins.
I agree. The system needs to crumble and change. Or balkanization of some sort. This program could have overwhelming support and it still wouldn’t happen. Hell, massive change to immigration policy already has overwhelming support in many western countries, and it still isn’t enacted.
OK, now who bells the cat?
All of the people who have the power to implement what you want, are against what you want. This isn't going to change within the current system. Too many people engage in such wishful thinking, we need to start at step 1: how do Whites get back to the point where we have the power to choose how we live? Voting in our current system is not the answer.
"A serious program of demographic recovery must follow. This begins with the immediate deportation of illegal aliens."
0 immigration and 100% enforcement changes the date Whites become a minority by a year or 2. Mass deportation due solely to ethnicity without regard for citizenship status is the only way Whites maintain a nation that Whites would want to live in. That isn't going to happen with the current system.
You're absolutely right. We need to stop pretending that moral clarity or sound policy will change anything. The people in charge aren't confused or waiting for better ideas. They're hostile to our existence, and they plan to stay that way.
The policies in “A Program for White Survival and American Renewal” are sensible, necessary, and grounded in reality. But believing they can be enacted through the current system is wishful thinking. That system exists to stop precisely this kind of renewal. It punishes defiance, rewards submission, and ensures that nothing essential is ever allowed to change.
So yes, the real first step is reclaiming the power to choose how we live. That power won't come through voting. It begins in the physical world. Families. Land. Skills. Culture. Bonds of trust that exist outside of state control.
This doesn't mean we give up. It means we stop waiting. We build where we are, with what we have, among those who still remember what a future worth living looks like.
The system will not save us. That truth should not lead to despair. It should lead to action
I'm sick of this shit. I agree with all the points, but I will never concede that it's impossible for White men to regain control of Shitshow America until fighting White men by the thousands attempt to run for political office all around the country on an explicitly pro-White, anti-jewish platform over and over and over again until exhaustion. White people need to see White people trying really hard and either failing or succeeding. Whatever the outcome, the metaphorical table will then be set for whatever comes next. There will be no more mealy-mouthed bullshit or political tricks attempting to put a veneer of civility on what is an outright war against our nation and race. Until I see that happen and fail, I will not concede this point. I don't even think we're lacking in numbers, I think we're lacking in vision and clarity, and maybe sufficient levels of piss and vinegar. There are at least 50 million adult White men in the good old USA. We have the numbers. If we bless our country ourselves, and then we'll suddenly find that "god" blessed the USA.
This is an excellent manifesto and your pinned comment and how you see the future unfolding makes complete sense.
For me, I feel a deep intellectual and spiritual kinship with White Americans, and indeed physical kinship as my family has been in this country since the 17th century in Virginia, and I have several White ancestors in my lineage.
Not that you need my solidarity to save your race and preserve the unique American identity, but you have it from me.
From a young age, I’ve never resonated with my Black brethren as much as I have with my White friends and family members, and I look in abject horror at the mentality and behavior of many of them.
You are the architects of this country's success and what makes it great. I wish you nothing but the best in your fight for the future of your people.
Thanks Mr Chad for this brilliant article .God bless you end God bless America
I suspect the future holds enclaves carved from the original nation, and I'm actually optimistic in that regard. As for the United States as a polity, and I would not be surprised if this was the purpose all along of mass migration and the other social ills inflicted upon us, it cannot be salvaged in its current form. We need to think in terms of what follows. I very much appreciate your continued mention of conservation and environmentalism, which are almost exclusively white things. Blood and soil nationalism, the only type that works and that should be encouraged, requires land as its very name implies. Quite recent and past attempts to sever our people from the soil indicate our enemies also realize this. Again, we need to realize the actual intent of the destroyers likely was based on malice rather than foolishness.
Although I disagree with an endpoint of preservation of a failed state, which the United States certainly is despite its wealth, the goals and means you set forth are spot on. We will need to acknowledge what failed within the past state and work to avoid those pitfalls to create a more and actual perfect union.
Such a refreshing combination of left and right perspectives. Kudos!
I only wish there was more than a snowball's chance in hell of enacting this agenda...
The only way to return to a semblance of America, as most of us knew it, is to return to the pre-1965 demographics of the country.
Unaccountable and secret no more!
Who Chad? Time to start naming their names! Who are these people who despise us so? What companies employ them? Who funds their operations? Where are their offices? Where did they learn these terrible things? Who writes their copy? What clubs have they joined? Who puts on their concerts? Who promotes their horrible music? Who designs their images? ? Delenda est!
You can start with Trump, the blowhard, who wants another half million chinese students in America. And as for his deporting the invaders, it's a pathetic effort, he would need to deport almost 13,000 a day to have any significant effect, the piddly 666, of all things, that he's doing isn't going to make a dent; 240,000 a year out of probably 30 million? Come on.
Why does this matter? How does 'naming names' accomplish anything? Do you think our enemies fear retribution? They do not. They know that Whites are suckers for 'racial reconciliation'. We have no power over our enemies because we have no direction amongst ourselves. For Whites, there can be only one path to durable success: Whites caring about Whites because they are White. Instead of worrying about 'Who?', tend to the Whites around you. Show them you care. Stop worrying about what the other guy is doing and look to your own efforts. There's always plenty to do.
He is being sarcastic, but seriously Hamburger Man. No troll, I chatted with a lot of National Socialist people. You have the most realistic and sustainable path to your ideals. Kudos, seriously not trolling.
Thank you. But I'm not a 'National Socialist' as National Socialists would understand it. That might explain it.
Got the pdf and read the preface! Shit! I’ve never had it so compellingly compiled! Sorrow, I feel great sorrow! So many dead! I am at a loss, Chad! My heart sinks! So much blood and death! For who?? I spent three years in the infantry, for who? I am almost afraid to read the book! Thank you, Sir!
I want the intelligence! I want to know all I can know about my enemy!
I would recommend reading Dr. Kevin MacDonald’s “Culture of Critique” trilogy.